Also known as: Our Radar Report, Pixelmojo AI Visibility Self-Audit, Radar Dogfood Report
Pixelmojo's own AI visibility scorecard, generated by Radar against pixelmojo.io and published verbatim every week. Same 13-tool methodology applied to ourselves: overall unified score and grade, per-tool breakdown, per-LLM citation coverage with mention rates, share-of-voice rank within the audited category, and any hallucination flags surfaced by the audit (verbatim quotes of what AI providers tell users vs. what is actually true). Server-side ISR every 6 hours; new content lands when the weekly Radar cron writes a new radar_audit_runs row for pixelmojo.io. Acts as a transparent dogfood proof for Radar customers: if our score drops, the page reflects that; if new hallucinations surface, they appear with the offending AI provider named.
Canonical resource
/labs/our-radar-reportWant to implement pixelmojo self-audit in your product?
Talk to our teamOur most-cited deep dives on AI search visibility, plus what we shipped this month.
We implemented every GEO tactic from our own playbook. Here is exactly what we built, what we changed, and what we learned about optimizing a real site for AI search citations.
Google Preferred Sources is the one AI visibility lever your audience controls, not the model. Here is how it works, who qualifies, and how to earn it.
Our analytics say Claude is our #1 AI traffic source. Our own Radar says Claude cites us the least. The two rankings are almost perfectly inverted. Here is why referral traffic cannot measure AI visibility.