Loading...
Stay ahead with insights, trends, and expert perspectives on design, development, and digital strategy from our team.
First findings from the Radar Brand Index. 50 named brands audited live with Radar. Stripe and BetterUp lead at 88/100. Hims and Hers hit 4/100. Three brands are completely invisible to AI. Here is what the data says.
Most AI SEO tools never actually query an LLM. They infer visibility from proxies. Static analysis cannot tell you what ChatGPT says about your brand. Only asking ChatGPT can.
Fifty real users went from a free AI visibility tool to a paid strategy. Here is the 5-stage conversion path they actually followed, where they dropped off, and what it means for you at whatever stage you are in.
Self-Audit / Updated weekly
Every week, Radar runs against pixelmojo.io. The findings below are published verbatim from the latest audit, including the parts that do not flatter us.
If a methodology cannot survive its own scrutiny, it is not a methodology worth selling. Latest run: May 7, 2026.
Radar found 10 factual errors in what AI providers are currently telling buyers about Pixelmojo. These are not screenshots from a research paper. They are live, in production, in front of every buyer asking AI about our brand right now. Quoted verbatim from the audit.
What Perplexity is telling buyers: Pixelmojo is an AI product development company specializing in building custom AI solutions that generate measurable ROI for B2B SaaS, agencies, and service businesses.
What is actually true: Pixelmojo is an AI product studio that focuses on lead qualification, AI co-workers, and AI visibility audits.
What Perplexity is telling buyers: Pixelmojo offers three flagship AI products, all with code ownership.
What is actually true: Pixelmojo offers three products: Vector, Hive, Radar.
What Perplexity is telling buyers: Vector: 12-dimension lead qualification engine for B2B teams. Scores inbound signals (intent, budget, timeline, authority, etc.) and routes ready-to-buy leads to sales. Deployed in 60 days. Example: '$0.29 to qualify 1,000 leads vs. HubSpot's $890/month.'
What is actually true: Vector lead qualification is priced at $2/resolution.
What Perplexity is telling buyers: Hive: Multi-agent orchestration layer turning AI chatbots into 'co-workers.' Coordinates agents for ops, CX, and tools with built-in governance/security. $2 per resolution vs. $20-50 for humans. 12-week build.
What is actually true: Hive is described as an AI co-worker but lacks specific pricing details in the verified facts.
What Perplexity is telling buyers: Radar: AI visibility platform with 12 tools for site audits (crawl access, robots.txt, llms.txt, AI readiness, citations, Reddit monitoring, hallucination detection, AEO, schema). Free tier: 6 technical tools. Paid unlocks 6 more LLM-powered tools.
What is actually true: Radar is not described in detail in the verified facts.
This is the value proposition. Most AI visibility tools track whether you are mentioned. Radar tracks whether what is said is accurate, then surfaces the corrections you need to make.
5 of 12 tools score grade A. Technical readiness across the AI infrastructure layer is solid.
Three actions, sequenced by impact. The audit re-runs next week and the changes show up here.
Correct product names, real pricing, accurate positioning. The hallucinations above exist because the canonical answer does not. Once it does, AI providers extract from it.
Three of four LLMs cite Pixelmojo at least once. Claude does not. Different LLMs weight different signals. Worth the dig.
Explicit, addressable line items in the AEO subscore. Not strategic problems, just unfinished work.
Overall AI Readiness: 60/100 (C). Middle of the pack, which is honest. Strong technical foundations, hallucination problems to fix, AEO work in progress.
We could publish a higher number by tuning the audit category or the query set. We do not. The audit runs with the same configuration we run for paying customers, and the result lands here unedited. If the score moves next week, you will see it move.
All 12 tools sorted by score. See the methodology for what each tool measures and how scores are calculated.
| Tool | Score | Grade |
|---|---|---|
| Source Influence | 99 | A |
| AI Bot Crawl | 95 | A |
| AI Readiness | 93 | A |
| llms.txt | 92 | A |
| robots.txt | 86 | A |
| Schema Audit | 71 | B |
| Reddit Mentions | 62 | C |
| AEO | 53 |
How often each provider mentioned Pixelmojo across the audit’s brand-related queries. The gaps below are the specific items we are working on.
Cited in 0 of 4 brand queries
Cited in 2 of 4 brand queries
Cited in 0 of 4 brand queries
Cited in 0 of 4 brand queries
Brand Index audits 50 named brands publicly with the same Radar methodology. This page applies that transparency to Pixelmojo. Publishing only flattering numbers would invalidate the methodology. Publishing what it actually finds is the proof.
What you see is the audit data with light interpretation. The same JSON lives in radar_audit_runs for every customer audit, gated to that customer.
Same methodology, your domain. Free first audit, 12 tools, 60 seconds.
| Citation Tracking | 47 | D |
| Answer Engine | 24 | F |
| Prompt SOV | 0 | F |
| Hallucination Check | 0 | F |