Self-Audit / Updated weekly

We dogfood Radar. Here’s what it caught.

Every week, Radar runs against pixelmojo.io. The findings below are published verbatim from the latest audit, including the parts that do not flatter us.

If a methodology cannot survive its own scrutiny, it is not a methodology worth selling. Latest run: August 7, 2026.

What is working

6 of 13 tools score grade A. Technical readiness across the AI infrastructure layer is solid.

AEO

100A

AI Readiness

100A

Hallucination Check

100A

AI Bot Crawl

98A

llms.txt

95A

Schema Audit

95A

What we are fixing this week

Three actions, sequenced by impact. The audit re-runs next week and the changes show up here.

1Publish a canonical “What is Pixelmojo” page

Correct product names, real pricing, accurate positioning. The hallucinations above exist because the canonical answer does not. Once it does, AI providers extract from it.

2Investigate the Claude gap

Three of four LLMs cite Pixelmojo at least once. Claude does not. Different LLMs weight different signals. Worth the dig.

3Add SpeakableSchema, ordered lists, and tables to the homepage

Explicit, addressable line items in the AEO subscore. Not strategic problems, just unfinished work.

The honest score

Overall AI Readiness: 77/100 (B). Middle of the pack, which is honest. Strong technical foundations, hallucination problems to fix, AEO work in progress.

We could publish a higher number by tuning the audit category or the query set. We do not. The audit runs with the same configuration we run for paying customers, and the result lands here unedited. If the score moves next week, you will see it move.

Full per-tool breakdown

All 13 tools sorted by score. See the methodology for what each tool measures and how scores are calculated.

Tool	Score	Grade
AEO	100	A
AI Readiness	100	A
Hallucination Check	100	A
AI Bot Crawl	98	A
llms.txt	95	A
Schema Audit	95	A
robots.txt	82	B
Source Influence	76	B
Reddit Mentions	70	B
Answer Engine	69	C
brandDisambiguation	60	C
Citation Tracking	47	D
Prompt SOV	13	F

Per-LLM Citation Coverage

How often each provider mentioned Pixelmojo across the audit’s brand-related queries. The gaps below are the specific items we are working on.

ChatGPT0%

Cited in 0 of 4 brand queries

Perplexity75%

Cited in 3 of 4 brand queries

Claude0%

Cited in 0 of 4 brand queries

Gemini50%

Cited in 2 of 4 brand queries

grok-4.30%

Cited in 0 of 4 brand queries

Why we publish this

Brand Index audits 50 named brands publicly with the same Radar methodology. This page applies that transparency to Pixelmojo. Publishing only flattering numbers would invalidate the methodology. Publishing what it actually finds is the proof.

What you see is the audit data with light interpretation. The same JSON lives in radar_audit_runs for every customer audit, gated to that customer.