One unified score for how AI search engines see your site. Combines bot access, structured data, llms.txt, and content quality into a single actionable report.
This tool runs our AI Crawl Checker and llms.txt Validator simultaneously, then synthesizes the results into 5 weighted categories. You get a 0-100 readiness score, a pentagonal radar showing your strengths and gaps, and a prioritized action roadmap to improve your AI visibility.
Can GPTBot, Claude, Perplexity, and search engines access your site? Do you have a deliberate bot policy?
JSON-LD schema markup, Organization/Article types, navigation and rich schemas.
llms.txt quality, structure, entity definitions, link coverage, and use policy.
Server-side rendering, title/description quality, and SSR framework detection.
How well your signals work together: structured data + llms.txt + bot access + SSR.
Your AI readiness score combines data from our Crawl Checker (bot access, structured data, content quality) and llms.txt Validator (structure, entities, links) into five weighted categories.
Our most-cited deep dives on AI search visibility, plus what we shipped this month.
When AI engines link your brand to the wrong same-named entity, you still get cited, but the citation points at someone else. Here is how brand disambiguation fails and how to fix it.
Reddit is the most-cited source in AI answers. The Reddit Brand Monitor finds what is said about your brand there, scores it, and flags AI-generated seeded posts.
The YouTube Brand Monitor tracks what is said about your brand on YouTube, scores it on five dimensions, and reads the actual transcripts so you see the coverage AI already hears.