Quick answer
The best AI visibility agency depends on what you need. For an audit plus the fixes made on your site in a fixed sprint, Pixelmojo runs both with its own Radar platform. For a dedicated GEO retainer on month-to-month terms, First Page Sage publishes its pricing. For B2B SaaS that wants SEO, GEO and digital PR from one team, Omniscient Digital focuses on software companies. For deep technical SEO and entity optimization, iPullRank leads on technical depth. For full-service digital marketing with AI search as one component, WebFX covers SEO, PPC, content, web design and social under one agency.
AI visibility agencies compared
Builds and uses its own tools. Radar (13-tool AI visibility platform) powers every engagement. Published the AI Search Playbook (10-part series on GEO/AEO methodology). Also builds production AI systems (Vector, Hive), so understands structured data and schema from the engineering side, not just the marketing side.
GEO
Full (built the tooling)
AEO
Full (published the methodology)
llms.txt
Yes (dynamic, auto-generated)
Schema
Deep (knowledge graph with 63 entities)
Citations
Yes (Radar: 4 scored + Grok)
Best for
B2B companies that want a technical partner who builds AI products and understands AI search from the inside.
Differentiator
Runs the audit and makes the fixes on your site in one 6-week sprint, using Radar, the audit platform it builds and sells.
Pricing
6-week sprint ($4,500) + optional retainer ($2,000-$3,500/mo)
Large-scale digital marketing agency with 500+ employees. Offers AI-powered marketing through their proprietary MarketingCloudFX platform. Covers SEO, PPC, content marketing, web design, and social media. GEO/AEO is part of their broader SEO offering rather than a standalone service.
GEO
Partial (within SEO offering)
AEO
Partial (content optimization)
llms.txt
Not documented
Schema
Standard (technical SEO package)
Citations
Limited
Best for
Enterprise and mid-market companies that want a single vendor for all digital marketing channels.
Differentiator
Scale, breadth of services, and deep team bench. Strong for companies that want one agency for everything digital.
Pricing
Custom (typically $3,000-$10,000+/mo)
Analytics-first agency founded by Wil Reynolds, known for combining big data tools and custom data pipelines with search strategy. Has been vocal about the shift from traditional search to AI-powered answers and has published thought leadership on adapting SEO strategy for AI search.
GEO
Emerging (adapting SEO methodology)
AEO
Emerging (content strategy focus)
llms.txt
Not documented
Schema
Standard to deep (varies by engagement)
Citations
Limited
Best for
Data-driven marketing teams at mid-to-large companies who want deep analytics, custom reporting, and strategy grounded in large-scale data analysis rather than templated playbooks.
Differentiator
Analytics-first: custom data pipelines and custom reporting behind its search strategy.
Pricing
Custom (typically $10,000+/mo)
Technical SEO agency led by Mike King, known for pushing the boundary on technical implementation and content engineering. Strong focus on structured data, entity optimization, and machine-readable content. Has published research on how AI models process and rank web content.
GEO
Strong (entity and technical focus)
AEO
Strong (content engineering)
llms.txt
Not documented
Schema
Deep (entity optimization specialty)
Citations
Limited
Best for
Companies with complex technical SEO needs that want an agency pushing the edge of what structured data and content engineering can do.
Differentiator
Technical SEO and content engineering, led by Mike King, a well-known voice in technical search.
Pricing
Custom (typically $10,000+/mo)
Founded by Evan Bailyn as an SEO and thought leadership agency. It says it launched a dedicated GEO service in May 2023. Its published GEO work covers content creation, outreach to the lists and databases AI engines draw on, and online reputation monitoring.
GEO
Strong (dedicated GEO service)
AEO
Strong (GEO and AEO agency)
llms.txt
Not documented
Schema
Not documented
Citations
Not documented
Best for
Companies that want a dedicated GEO retainer built around content and third-party list placements.
Differentiator
Publishes its GEO pricing openly and offers month-to-month terms. Says its GEO service launched in May 2023.
Pricing
$6,000-$12,000/mo, month-to-month (as published)
Organic growth agency for B2B software companies, co-founded by David Ly Khim, Alex Birkett and Allie Konchar. Its service pages list an AI visibility audit, optimization of owned content for LLM visibility, digital PR and brand-mention outreach.
GEO
Strong (GEO service and AI visibility audit)
AEO
Partial (owned-content optimization)
llms.txt
Not documented
Schema
Not documented
Citations
Audit only (no recurring monitoring documented)
Best for
B2B SaaS companies that want SEO, GEO and content run by one team, with digital PR to earn mentions on other sites.
Differentiator
B2B SaaS specialists who pair GEO with digital PR and brand-mention outreach.
Pricing
About $120,000/year for full-service work (as published)
Growth marketing agency serving multiple verticals including SaaS, healthcare, fintech, B2B, and ecommerce. Combines paid acquisition, content, and SEO with a growth experimentation framework. AI visibility is an emerging part of their content strategy offering.
GEO
Emerging
AEO
Partial (content marketing angle)
llms.txt
Not documented
Schema
Standard
Citations
Not documented
Best for
Venture-backed startups and growth-stage companies that want aggressive growth marketing with SEO as one channel among paid, content, and lifecycle marketing.
Differentiator
Strong SaaS growth marketing expertise. Experimentation-driven approach to all channels including search.
Pricing
Custom (typically $5,000-$15,000/mo)
Content-driven SEO agency that builds high-authority content and earns editorial links at scale. Known for data-driven content strategy and producing content that ranks well and earns natural backlinks. Their content methodology translates well to AI citation because they already optimize for extractability and authority.
GEO
Emerging (content authority translates)
AEO
Partial (content structure strength)
llms.txt
Not documented
Schema
Standard
Citations
Not documented
Best for
Companies that want to build long-term content authority.
Differentiator
Content production and editorial link earning at scale, for teams building long-term content authority.
Pricing
Custom (typically $10,000-$20,000+/mo)
Performance marketing agency for B2B tech companies. Combines paid media, SEO, content, and CRO under a "Customer Generation" methodology. Focus on pipeline and revenue attribution rather than vanity metrics. AI search visibility is part of their evolving SEO offering.
GEO
Emerging
AEO
Partial
llms.txt
Not documented
Schema
Standard
Citations
Not documented
Best for
B2B SaaS companies with $10M+ revenue that want an agency focused on pipeline generation and revenue attribution, with SEO as one integrated channel.
Differentiator
Pipeline and revenue attribution focus for B2B SaaS, under its Customer Generation methodology.
Pricing
Custom (typically $7,500-$15,000+/mo)
Why Pixelmojo is different
Pixelmojo is an AI product studio, not a marketing agency. We build and sell our own AI visibility platform (Radar), publish our methodology (the AI Search Playbook), and build production AI systems (Vector, Hive). Our AI visibility service puts that to work on your site: we run the audit and make the fixes ourselves.
- 1.We built the tools. Radar runs 13 audit tools in staged batches across crawl access, structured data, llms.txt, citations, hallucinations, and share of voice. We use it on every client engagement.
- 2.We published the methodology. The AI Search Playbook is a 10-part series covering GEO, AEO, llms.txt, structured data, knowledge graphs, and citation optimization. It is public, not gated.
- 3.We measure ourselves the same way. Our own site has a 63-entity knowledge graph and structured data throughout, and scored 74 (grade B) on its latest Radar audit on 6 November 2026. We also track how ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Gemini answer about us every week.
- 4.We build AI products. Vector (lead qualification) and Hive (multi-agent orchestration) are production AI systems we built. Understanding how LLMs work from the engineering side makes our GEO implementations deeper.
Technical capability comparison
| Agency | GEO | AEO | llms.txt | Schema | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pixelmojo | Full (built the tooling) | Full (published the methodology) | Yes (dynamic, auto-generated) | Deep (knowledge graph with 63 entities) | Yes (Radar: 4 scored + Grok) |
| WebFX | Partial (within SEO offering) | Partial (content optimization) | Not documented | Standard (technical SEO package) | Limited |
| Seer Interactive | Emerging (adapting SEO methodology) | Emerging (content strategy focus) | Not documented | Standard to deep (varies by engagement) | Limited |
| iPullRank | Strong (entity and technical focus) | Strong (content engineering) | Not documented | Deep (entity optimization specialty) | Limited |
| First Page Sage | Strong (dedicated GEO service) | Strong (GEO and AEO agency) | Not documented | Not documented | Not documented |
| Omniscient Digital | Strong (GEO service and AI visibility audit) | Partial (owned-content optimization) | Not documented | Not documented | Audit only (no recurring monitoring documented) |
| NoGood | Emerging | Partial (content marketing angle) | Not documented | Standard | Not documented |
| Siege Media | Emerging (content authority translates) | Partial (content structure strength) | Not documented | Standard | Not documented |
| Directive Consulting | Emerging | Partial | Not documented | Standard | Not documented |
Audit and implementation, or recommendations only?
The biggest difference between agencies is who does the work after the audit. Some hand you a report and a plan for your team to carry out. Others change your site themselves. Ask before you sign, and ask what your own team still has to supply: access, approvals, product facts and content sign-off.
In Pixelmojo's Visibility Sprint ($4,500, 6 weeks, no retainer required), this is how the work splits:
| We change on your site | We hand you |
|---|---|
| Structured data (Organization, Article, FAQPage, Speakable) | A full 13-tool Radar audit of your site and 3 competitors, with our analysis |
| AI bot access rules in robots.txt | A 60-day action plan ranked by effort and impact |
| Answer-first restructuring of your existing content | Citation monitoring, set up and running |
| Knowledge graph entity mapping, llms.txt, and brand disambiguation if AI confuses you with another company | Competitive AI visibility benchmarking against the same 3 competitors |
Which agency fits your situation?
- A B2B SaaS company. Omniscient Digital focuses on B2B software companies. Directive Consulting suits B2B SaaS above $10M revenue that wants pipeline attribution. Siege Media suits SaaS teams that need a content pipeline. Pixelmojo suits B2B teams that want the fixes made for them.
- A small marketing team on a fixed budget. Look for a short commitment. Pixelmojo's sprint is a fixed price for a fixed 6 weeks. First Page Sage publishes month-to-month terms. Most other agencies here quote custom monthly retainers.
- An in-house team that will do the work. You may need a tool rather than an agency. An audit tool such as Radar, or a tracking subscription, tells your team what to fix and whether it worked.
How we selected these agencies
This is not a paid directory. Agencies were selected based on their public presence in AI search optimization, published methodology, tooling capabilities, and relevance to brands looking for AI visibility services in 2026. We included a mix of dedicated GEO/AEO specialists and established digital marketing agencies that are adapting their SEO practice for AI search.
Pixelmojo is included because we sell an AI visibility service and this comparison would be incomplete without it. We are an AI product studio, not a marketing agency, and we rank ourselves first, so weigh that. First Page Sage and Omniscient Digital were added on 6 November 2026 after ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity named them in our weekly AI answer monitoring. Competitor details come from each agency's own website; check them with the agency before you buy.
Related comparisons
Evaluating specific AI visibility tools rather than agencies? See how Radar compares head to head.
Frequently asked questions
What is an AI visibility agency?
An AI visibility agency works on how AI answer engines such as ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Gemini describe and recommend your brand. The work usually combines an audit of what those engines say today, fixes to your own site (crawler access, structured data, clearer content), earning mentions on the third-party pages the engines read, and monitoring of the answers over time. No agency controls what an AI engine says, so judge one on what it measures and what it changes, not on promised placements.
What is the difference between a GEO agency and an SEO agency?
A GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) agency works on how your brand appears in AI-generated answers. An SEO agency works on rankings in Google and Bing. The two overlap: AI engines that search the web read many of the same pages search engines rank, so crawlable, clear pages and mentions on trusted third-party sites matter to both. What GEO adds is measuring the answers themselves, across engines, and tracing which sources those answers cite. Many agencies now offer both.
How do I choose the right AI visibility agency?
Ask five things: (1) Do they implement the changes on your site, or hand you recommendations? (2) What do they measure before and after, across which AI engines, and how often? (3) Do they show you the actual AI answers and the sources those answers cite? (4) What is the minimum commitment: a fixed sprint, a monthly retainer, or an annual contract? (5) What does your team still have to do: access, approvals, product facts, content sign-off?
Can AI search visibility be measured?
Yes, with caveats. Common measures are mentions (does the answer name your brand for a category question), citations (does an engine that searches the web link to your site), the sources an answer cites, factual accuracy (does AI state wrong facts about you), and whether AI describes your brand correctly when asked about it by name. Answers vary between runs and engines, so measure the same questions repeatedly rather than trusting one answer. Radar by Pixelmojo measures these across ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Gemini.
How long does it take to improve AI search visibility?
There is no fixed timeline, and an agency that promises one is guessing. Fixing crawler access can take effect the next time an engine fetches your pages. Engines that search the web, such as Perplexity and Gemini with Google Search grounding, can pick up changed pages within weeks. Models that answer from training data alone change only when they are retrained, which can take months and may not reflect your changes at all.
Is GEO replacing SEO?
GEO is not replacing SEO. It is an additional channel that is growing in importance as more people use AI search engines for discovery. Google still drives the majority of search traffic, and traditional SEO remains essential. However, AI search engines are capturing an increasing share of commercial and informational queries. Brands that invest in both SEO and GEO will have the broadest discovery surface.